Sell Data to AI
Home Data Asset Score Pricing API documentation US labs and CROs list
For brokers
How to become an AI data broker Data broker business model Buyer programs compared Qualify a company AI training data companies
For data companies
Firmographic data providers Company data API
Seller guides
How to sell data to AI companies Is it legal? FAQ and glossary About
Check domain/company
Deal tracker · Reported figures only

AI Data Licensing Deals: A Tracker of Publicly Reported Deals

Every deal below has a named source and a date. Most are platform and publisher deals, which are very different from a company licensing its internal records. The second half of the page explains why.

Last checked: 7 October 2026. Figures are as reported; we have not seen the contracts.

~$60M/yrGoogle and Reddit, reported
$250M+OpenAI and News Corp, over five years, reported
$104MShutterstock AI licensing revenue, 2023
$10MGoogle's agreed price for Spirit Airlines data
The tracker

Publicly reported AI data and content licensing deals

Sorted by type. "Reported" means the figure comes from press coverage or an executive interview, not a published contract.

DealWhat is licensedReported valueSource and dateStatus note
Google and Reddit
Platform
Reddit posts and comments for AI useabout $60M a yearSigned February 2024, value widely reported. Renewal talks: Wall Street Journal via CNBC, July 22, 2026Reported in renewal negotiation; Reddit had discussed ending Google's AI access
OpenAI and News Corp
Publisher
Content from News Corp publicationsmore than $250M over five yearsAnnounced May 2024; value reported by The Wall Street Journal, via Variety, May 2024Multiyear agreement
Shutterstock AI licensing
Stock media
Images, video and metadata licensed to AI developersabout $104M (2023)CEO interview with Bloomberg, reported by PetaPixel, June 2024Revenue across many buyers, not one deal
Shutterstock 2024
Stock media
Same business unitabout $138M (2024)PetaPixel correction, June 7, 2024A projection for the whole unit that includes AI licensing
Google and Spirit Airlines
Company archive
Internal emails, Teams messages, spreadsheets, operations files$10M agreedABC News and TIME, August 2026; court status via Reuters, Aug 19, 2026Bankruptcy sale; final approval not confirmed as of 7 Oct 2026
micro1 and Spirit Airlines
Company archive
The same Spirit dataset$12.5M offerCompeting bid notice filed Sept 3, 2026, per Stretto report, Sept 13, 2026An offer, not a closed deal
Closure market (Troveo)
Shut-down startups
Slack, email and code archives of closed startups$10K to $100K per archive; ~$5K per repoFigures cited by Troveo in 2026 coverage (Forbes, April 16, 2026; Fast Company; Gizmodo)Typical ranges cited by one participant

How this tracker is kept. A deal is listed only when a named outlet, a company executive or a court filing reported a value, and we can give the source and date. We do not estimate undisclosed deals, we do not convert reported figures into per-unit prices, and we do not list rumors from social media. Offers and pending sales are labeled as such. When a status changes, such as a court ruling on the Spirit sale or a reported outcome of the Reddit renewal talks, we update the row and the "last checked" date rather than adding a new one. If a figure is later corrected by its source, as PetaPixel did for Shutterstock's 2024 number, we use the corrected wording.

Market context, both estimates: more than 50 companies sell data and RL environments to AI labs, with about $8.5B in revenue (Deedy Das market map, July 2026); labs are on a path to more than $100B a year of data spend by 2030 (Will Depue, July 2026). Our full case notes: Spirit Airlines and shut-down startups.

Reading the table

Four things the reported deals have in common

Patterns visible across the rows, before any comparison with your company.

Most values are reported, not published

Only Shutterstock's figure came from its own executive. The Reddit and News Corp numbers come from press reports about private contracts. Treat them as orders of magnitude, not prices.

Platform deals are recurring

Reddit's deal is reported as a yearly figure, and the July 2026 reporting shows that such licenses come up for renewal and get renegotiated. A recurring license is a different product from a one-off sale.

Company-level deals surface only by accident

Spirit's sale is public because bankruptcy sales go through court. The closure-market figures are public because a participant cited them to reporters. Running-company deals are private contracts.

Competition shows up when the process is open

In the one auction on the list, the reported price moved from a $5 million opening bid to $10 million, and a later $12.5 million offer followed. More bidders gave the seller more leverage on price and terms.

What the table does not show is just as telling. There are no rows for ordinary companies of 20 to 1,000 people licensing their internal records through buyer programs, even though those programs publish six- and seven-figure ranges. Those deals are private contracts, so they rarely surface. When you compare your situation with this tracker, start with the published program ranges and treat the headline deals as background.

Why platform deals are not company deals

A $60 million platform deal says little about your 80-person firm

The same word, "licensing," covers two very different transactions.

Platform and publisher deals

  • Very large libraries of posts, articles or media, much of it already public
  • Ongoing access, often renewed or renegotiated each term
  • Signed directly between the platform and the AI company, with no broker
  • The licensor already has legal and licensing teams
  • Value comes partly from scale and partly from the brand's content

A company licensing its work records

  • Private records: email, chat, tickets, CRM notes, SOPs, code with history
  • Usually a scoped copy delivered once, sometimes with follow-ups
  • Often handled by a data company program such as micro1, Mode or Grepped
  • Needs de-identification, employee notice and client-contract checks
  • Value comes from showing how real work gets done, decision by decision

The useful public reference for a company of 20 to 1,000 people is not the Reddit number. It is what buyer programs publish on their own pages, checked 7 October 2026: micro1 lists "$100k+ qualified," "$500k+ large-scale" and "$1M+ highly unique"; Mode lists "$100K-$5M"; Grepped lists "$20K-$5M." Those are ranges with "up to" logic, not averages, and nobody can price your data without seeing a sample. Our guide to what AI companies pay breaks down what moves a number inside those ranges.

What does carry over

Three lessons a company can take from platform deals

Terms expire

Reddit's renewal talks show that a license has an end date and a renewal moment. Read the term, the renewal and what happens to the copy afterward. Our AI data licensing agreement outline lists the clauses.

Exclusivity has a price

A licensor that sells to several buyers keeps its options open. If a buyer wants exclusivity, it should be time-limited and priced. See exclusivity and resale rights.

Tiers pay differently

Practitioners say raw data is the cheapest tier and evaluations built on it are worth roughly ten times more. See raw data vs evaluations vs environments.

Timeline

The reported deals in date order, 2024 to 2026

The same facts as the tracker, arranged by date, so you can see how the market moved from platforms to company records.

DateEventSource
February 2024Google and Reddit sign an AI content deal, widely reported at about $60 million a yearWidely reported; recapped by CNBC, July 22, 2026
May 2024News Corp and OpenAI announce a multiyear licensing deal, reported at more than $250 million over five yearsThe Wall Street Journal, via Variety
June 2024Shutterstock's CEO says AI licensing brought in $104 million in 2023; about $138 million projected for 2024 for the unit including AI licensingBloomberg interview, reported by PetaPixel (correction June 7, 2024)
April 16, 2026Forbes reports closed startups selling old Slack and email archives; Troveo's prices circulateForbes; also Fast Company, Gizmodo
July 2026Market map counts 50+ companies selling data and RL environments to labs, about $8.5 billion in revenueDeedy Das (estimate)
July 2026Estimate that labs are on a path to more than $100 billion a year of data spend by 2030Will Depue (estimate)
July 22, 2026Reddit and Google reported to be negotiating a renewal; Reddit had discussed ending Google's AI accessThe Wall Street Journal, via CNBC
August 14, 2026Google named winning bidder for Spirit Airlines' de-identified enterprise data at $10 millionStretto report, Sept 13, 2026; ABC News, TIME
August 19, 2026Spirit approval hearing delayed after a union privacy objectionReuters
September 3, 2026micro1 files a $12.5 million competing bid notice for the Spirit dataStretto report, Sept 13, 2026
October 7, 2026Final outcome of the Spirit sale not confirmed when we checkedOur check

Two shifts stand out. First, the subject of the deals moved from public content (forum posts, news articles, stock media) to private records of how work gets done (Slack, email, operations files). Second, the scrutiny grew. The 2024 deals were negotiated quietly between large companies with legal teams. The 2026 company-record sales drew employee objections, privacy reviews and press attention.

For a company considering a deal now, that history cuts both ways. Demand for internal work records is visible and public. So is the expectation that sellers handle employees, clients and privacy carefully. Buyers know it too, which is why the programs publish privacy statements on their own pages.

How to read a reported figure

Seven questions to ask of any headline deal number

Use these before you quote a deal to your board, or let a buyer quote one to you.

1. Who reported it?

A company's own executive (Shutterstock's CEO), a newspaper citing people familiar with the deal (the Reddit and News Corp figures), or a court filing (Spirit). Each carries a different level of certainty.

2. Per year or in total?

About $60 million a year (Reddit) and more than $250 million over five years (News Corp) are different shapes. Convert to the same basis before comparing.

3. One buyer or many?

Shutterstock's $104 million is revenue across its AI licensing business, not a single contract. Aggregates look larger than any one deal.

4. Actual or projected?

Shutterstock's 2024 figure was a projection for a whole business unit, as PetaPixel's correction made clear. Projections are plans, not payments.

5. Closed or offered?

micro1's $12.5 million for the Spirit data was an offer filed with the court, not a closed purchase. Offers tell you about demand; only closed deals tell you about price.

6. Approved or pending?

Google's $10 million Spirit bid needed court approval, which we could not confirm as of 7 October 2026. Quote pending deals as pending.

7. Still running?

Licenses end. The July 2026 reporting on Reddit and Google shows that even a well-known deal can be renegotiated or ended at renewal.

And one for yourself

Is the asset in the headline anything like yours? A forum, a newspaper archive and an airline's records are each very different from the work history of a 100-person company.

By company size

What the deal tracker means for a company of 50, 200 or 1,000 people

None of these companies will sign a Reddit-style deal. Each can learn something different from the table.

50 people

Ignore the platform figures entirely. Your reference points are the published program ranges and the published minimums: Mode lists 20+ full-time US office employees (10+ for accounting firms, 6+ for law firms) and micro1 lists 30+. The lesson from the tracker is about terms: even large licensors negotiate term length and renewal, and so can you.

200 people

You have enough systems and history for buyers to value different parts differently, which is what made the Spirit auction competitive. The lesson is to collect more than one offer against the same manifest, and to compare them on exclusivity, scope of use and liability as well as price.

1,000 people

Your records may be large or unique enough for direct lab intake as well as data company programs. The lesson from platform deals is structure: ask whether a recurring license (new records each year) fits better than a one-off copy, and price exclusivity separately if a buyer asks for it.

Common mistakes when using deal headlines

Dividing a platform deal by its user count

Per-user or per-post arithmetic on a platform deal produces a number that does not apply to private company records. The assets, buyers and terms are different.

Treating "up to" as typical

Program ranges such as "$100K-$5M" are bands with a top end, not averages. Most companies will not be at the top.

Quoting an offer as a sale

An offer filed in a court case or made in a negotiation is not a closed price. Ask what was actually paid, and under what conditions.

Forgetting the cost side

Export, review, de-identification, legal time and employee communication all cost something. A headline number never shows the seller's costs.

FAQ

AI data licensing deals: questions

How much does Google pay Reddit for its data?

The Google and Reddit deal, signed in February 2024, has been widely reported at about $60 million a year. On July 22, 2026, CNBC reported a Wall Street Journal story that the two companies were negotiating a renewal and that Reddit had discussed ending Google's access to its content for AI use.

What is the largest publicly reported AI content licensing deal?

Among the deals on this tracker, the largest reported headline value is News Corp's multiyear agreement with OpenAI, announced in May 2024 and reported to be worth more than $250 million over five years. Many other deals have undisclosed terms, so a public tracker is never complete.

How much has Shutterstock earned from AI licensing?

Shutterstock's CEO told Bloomberg that licensing to AI developers brought in $104 million in 2023, as reported in June 2024. The company projected about $138 million for 2024 for the business unit that includes AI licensing, according to a correction PetaPixel published on June 7, 2024.

Do these deals tell me what my company's data is worth?

Not directly. Platform and publisher deals license huge, mostly public content libraries, often with ongoing access. A company of 20 to 1,000 people licenses a private, scoped copy of internal work records. Use the ranges each buyer program publishes as your anchor instead.

Where can I find company data deals, not platform deals?

Very few company-level deals are public, because they are private contracts under NDA. The visible exceptions are court-run sales like Spirit Airlines and the 2026 closure-market reporting on shut-down startups. The published payout ranges of buyer programs are the most useful public reference.

Is the Google and Reddit AI deal still active?

On July 22, 2026, CNBC reported a Wall Street Journal story that the deal was ending soon, that the companies were negotiating a renewal, and that Reddit had discussed ending Google's access to its content for AI use. We have not confirmed the outcome of those talks.

Why are so few company-level data deals reported?

They are private contracts, usually under NDA, between a company and a data buyer. The ones that become public do so for special reasons: a bankruptcy sale that must go through court, like Spirit Airlines, or a market participant citing prices to reporters, like Troveo in the 2026 closure-market coverage.

How big is the AI training data market?

Estimates only. Deedy Das's market map from July 2026 counts more than 50 companies selling data and RL environments to AI labs, with about $8.5 billion in revenue. Will Depue said in July 2026 that labs are on a path to more than $100 billion a year of data spend by 2030.

Skip the headline numbers. Check the published rules.

See which buyer programs your company fits, by their own published minimums and ranges. It runs in your browser and stores nothing.