For companies, not individuals. Enter your company website. The check reads up to four of your public pages, finds the facts AI data buyers screen on, shows each one with a word-for-word quote, and compares them with the rules micro1, Mode and Grepped publish. It does not price your data. Nobody can do that without seeing it.
Rather answer a few questions? Use the eligibility checker. It runs in your browser.
Use the main domain of the company that owns the records, such as example.com. The result lists what we found, quoted from your pages, then a likely, possible or unlikely fit for each program, with an apply button for each.
Independent site. Some links are referral links: if your company signs with a buyer through them, the buyer may pay us a fee. You are not charged, and we never see your data. Disclosure.
We read up to four public pages of your website (home, about, careers, help) and compare what they say with the rules the data buyers publish. About 20 seconds. Free, no email, 3 checks a day.
Enter the operating company's own site. A product microsite or a holding group's page rarely says how big the team is or how the business runs.
A site checked in the last week returns the stored result. Checking a site you already checked today does not use up one of your 3 checks.
If your pages do not state your size or systems, the eligibility checker asks seven questions and sends nothing anywhere.
The check does one narrow job well: it turns what your own website says into the facts a buyer program screens on, and shows you the evidence for each one.
We reduce it to the bare domain and confirm it looks like a real website address. That is the only thing we ask for. No account, no name, no email.
Your home page, plus the about, careers and help pages when your site links to them. We read only text any visitor can open, once per check.
An AI model reads the text and returns each fact with a sentence copied from your pages. We then match every quote against the text we read. A quote that does not match word for word is dropped.
Each program's published rules decide a likely, possible or unlikely fit. The reasons are written out in plain words, next to the program's published range and an apply button.
Each signal maps to something a buyer publishes, or to something that decides what you could offer at all. Rules are quoted from each program's own pages, as published, checked 7 October 2026.
Every program card on the result carries one of three labels. Every signal can also read "not stated on the pages we read". Here is what each one means, and what it does not mean.
The facts on your pages meet every published rule the check can test, such as a stated team of 45 with a US office against micro1's 30+ and its US priority. A reason to apply, not an acceptance.
A deciding fact is not stated, sits at the edge of a rule, or the program publishes no minimum at all. Grepped is always possible for that reason. Read the reasons, then confirm in the program's own application.
Your pages state something that misses a published rule: a team of 12 against micro1's 30+, a team with no US presence for Mode, or a company founded less than two years ago.
We found no quote for this fact. It is not a negative. It means your public pages do not say, which is common, and the program's result stays at possible on that point.
The check applies the same published rules as the eligibility checker. The difference is the input: here, a rule can only be met or missed by a fact your pages state. Where they say nothing, the rule stays open.
| Program | Published rule | Likely when your pages show | Unlikely when your pages show | Published range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| micro1 | 30+ employees (referral posting: 30 to 200); mature operations, documented processes, modern software tools; primarily English; US prioritized, then other Western markets | A stated team of 30 or more, on an English site. No visible US presence turns likely into possible. | A stated team under 30, or a site that is not in English and does not state 30+. Over 200 people is noted, not penalized. | "$100K-$2M+ for approved data packages" |
| Mode | 20+ full-time US office employees; accounting firms 10+; law firms 6+; several years of records the company owns; US-based teams strongest fit | A stated team at or above your industry's minimum, and a visible US presence | A stated team below your minimum, pages that show no US presence, or a founding year less than two years ago | "$100K-$5M" |
| Grepped | Any vertical | Never: no minimum is published, so there is nothing to meet | Never, for the same reason | "$20K-$5M" |
Most real companies do not publish their headcount. An about page tells a story, a careers page lists open roles, and a help center explains the product. None of them is written for a data buyer. In our own test runs, a large and well-known US software company came back with team size not stated, because none of the four pages gave a number.
Systems are even rarer. The software a company runs on inside the business shows up mainly in job ads ("experience with HubSpot required") or on a culture page that mentions Slack. The check deliberately ignores integration lists and partner logos, because a software company that lists fifty integrations does not run its own work in all fifty.
Answer the questions yourself. The eligibility checker asks seven questions: country, full-time office staff, industry, years of records, systems, language and client-confidential data. It applies the same published rules and runs entirely in your browser, so nothing you enter is sent anywhere.
Keep what the website check did find. The quotes are still useful. They show what a buyer's first look at your site will see, and they can save you typing in the questionnaire.
Do not edit your website to pass. Buyers verify headcount, ownership and records in their own review. A number added to your site for a checker changes nothing in that review, and it can confuse your customers and your future hires.
Use both. The website check shows what your public pages prove on their own. The questionnaire shows where you stand with the facts only you know.
| Website check (this page) | Eligibility checker | |
|---|---|---|
| What it uses | Your public website text, quoted | Your own answers to seven questions |
| Headcount | Only when your pages state it | The number you enter |
| Years of records | Founding year, as a rough proxy | Years of records you still hold |
| Systems | Only those your pages say you use | Every system you tick from the buyers' list |
| Programs | micro1, Mode, Grepped | The same three, plus Miro Advisory and direct lab intake for information |
| What is sent | Your domain, to our server | Nothing; it runs in your browser |
| Limit | 3 new websites a day per visitor | None |
The check is a first filter on public text. A buyer's review is the real decision, and it looks at things no website shows.
The website check sits before the first step. Practitioners' advice for everything after it: share a manifest and samples first, never a full dataset before a price, and get more than one offer.
These companies and their quotes are invented to show how the rules play out. The labels are what the check returns for those pages. No prices appear, because no program publishes one for a given company.
Next: Mode is the program to read first. The high client-confidential flag comes before any application, though. Client tax and bookkeeping files sit under engagement letters, so the firm checks what it may include. What remains is often its own operations: close checklists, review procedures and templates.
Next: two likely fits and one possible, so it can apply to all three and compare offers on terms, not only on price. Before sending anything, it scans its repositories for secrets, checks open-source licenses, asks whether its investors must approve, and plans how to tell staff whose Slack messages are in scope.
Next: the check could not see the firm's 38 staff, so the owner runs the eligibility checker with the real number. micro1 stays possible as a Western market outside the US, and Mode stays unlikely. GDPR covers staff and client contacts in the records, so lawful basis comes first.
Fictional companies with invented quotes, for illustration only. Not real firms, not offers, and not a prediction of any buyer's decision. A real result card shows each program's published range, never a price for your company.
The check reads public pages only. It shows you nothing a visitor to your website could not read for themselves, and it keeps almost nothing. Full details are in our privacy policy.
You type a domain. That is the only input. There is no account to create and no contact form behind the result.
We never connect to your email, chat, files or any internal system. We never receive, view or store your records, before or after you apply.
Nothing is stored except the domain, the result and a salted hash of your IP address, used only to enforce the daily limit.
A result is kept for 7 days so the same website is not read again and again. After that, a new check reads the pages fresh.
We never contact the company that was checked, and we never tell a buyer that a check was run or what it found.
Checked websites are never used for anything else. They are not added to a list, not used for marketing and not shared. A buyer hears from you only if you apply on its own form.
The check is deliberately cautious. It would rather say "not stated" than guess. These are the limits to keep in mind when you read a result.
If your about or careers page is not linked from the home page, the check may never reach it, and the facts on it will read as not stated.
Some sites load their text with scripts after the page opens. If too little text comes back, the check says so and suggests the questionnaire rather than inventing a result.
A page that pictures only the leadership gives a minimum, not a headcount. If the result counts only the people shown, use the questionnaire with your real number.
A firm founded in 2005 may hold only three years of email after a system migration or a retention policy. Buyers care about the records you still hold.
The check compares micro1, Mode and Grepped, the programs with apply links here. Miro Advisory and direct lab intake appear in the eligibility checker, for information.
3 new websites per visitor per day, and 300 checks a day in total for everyone. When the limit is reached, the questionnaire still works.
Edits to your website show only after the stored result expires. The date and time of the reading are printed under every result.
Rules are as published on 7 October 2026. When a program changes its terms, we update the rules and the date, here and on the comparison page.
The check cannot see what your records contain, how clean they are, or what your contracts allow. Those decide the outcome, and only a buyer's review sees them.
Each one costs time with a buyer later. All of them are easy to avoid once you know them.
Entering a product site, a brand site or the parent group's domain.
Check the site of the company that owns the records and would sign the deal.
Treating a likely fit as a promise of a deal or a price.
Read it as "your public facts meet the published rules". The buyer still reviews the records and decides.
Giving up because the check could not find your team size.
Silence is not a miss. Enter the real number in the eligibility checker.
Counting contractors, or listing tools you stopped using, to clear a minimum.
Mode counts full-time US office employees. Give honest numbers in the application; the review checks them anyway.
Ignoring a high client-confidential flag because it does not change the fit label.
Read your client contracts first. See is it legal to sell company data. General information, not legal advice. Talk to your own lawyer before you sign.
Clicking apply before deciding who signs, what is in scope and how staff will hear about it.
Settle those first. Staff wrote the messages; see employees and selling company data.
The check is step one. Here is the order that saves the most time for a company of 10 to 1,000 people.
No. Nobody can price your data without seeing it, and this check never sees it. It reads your public website, finds the facts buyers screen on, and compares them with each program’s published rules. The result shows each program’s published payout range, as published, which is a range and not a price for your company.
Because none of the pages we read gave that fact with a quote we could match word for word. That is common: most companies do not publish their headcount or the software they use inside the business. It is not a negative. Use the eligibility checker to enter the real numbers yourself.
Up to four public pages: your home page, and the about, careers and help pages when your site links to them. Nothing is stored except the domain, the result and a salted hash of your IP address, used only for the daily limit. There is no login, no email and no access to any of your systems.
No. We never contact the company that was checked and never pass a result to a buyer. Checked websites are never used for anything else, including lists. A program hears about your company only if you click an apply button and fill in its own form.
Results are cached for 7 days, so a site checked in the last week returns the stored result. Your changes show once that week is over. In the meantime, the eligibility checker gives an answer from your own inputs right away.
Grepped lists any vertical and publishes no employee, country or years minimum. With no published rule to meet or miss, the honest result is possible fit: only Grepped’s own review can decide.
No. Likely fit means the facts on your public pages meet every published rule the check can test. Each buyer then reviews what your records actually contain, and decides acceptance, scope and price. No buyer promises acceptance, and neither do we.
Yes, as a reality check. micro1 prioritizes the US, then other Western markets, and lists primarily English. Mode’s rule counts full-time US office employees. Grepped publishes no country rule. The result names which rule your location or language touches, so you can decide where to apply.
Four public pages, eight signals with quotes, three programs. Free, no login, and nothing kept beyond the domain, the result and a salted IP hash.